Anwar “Pertandingan LOMPAT JAUH….8.99m” ~Malaysiakini

Malaysiakini reports with Headlines on line: Sept 5 and the one that we have keen interests is obviously this by a local newspaper,” Barisan Nasional members of parliament have been requested to hand in their respective passports for an overseas study trip ahead of Sept 16, the deadline earmarked by PKR leader Anwar Ibrahim to change the government. To us “916” is a foregone conclusion as everyone is talking about it from the vegetable seller in the market,rural folks to the international foreign investors.

“HOT” “Anything New”. I was privelege to have received a phonecall from the the “Bureau chief” of Bernama Sarawak” Caroline this morning. She asked me to clarify certain political activities within the party “Parti Rakyat Sarawak” which is still confidential. However we shared the same opinions that 916 has stirred everyone’s imagination and a lot of sms has been flying here and there. The latest at 9.58 am” Pertandingan Lompat Jauh.Closing date 16ths Sept.haha”

Lets’ talk about long jump shall we. The long jump is an athletics (track and field) event in which athletes combine speed, strength, and agility in an attempt to leap as far from the take-off point as possible. There are four main components of the long jump: the approach run, the last two strides, takeoff and action in the air, and landing. Speed in the run-up, or approach, and a high leap off the board are the fundamentals of success. Because speed is such an important factor of the approach, it is not surprising that many long jumpers also compete successfully in sprints. The official record of the long Jump (correct me if I’m wrong or behind time) is by Mike Powell at 8.99 metres.

The last few days if you might recall were the days when the speed of the sms reached handphone users in record speed jolting the government administration and worrying the BN political parties to the core. What was it? Who started the posting? It’s too easy and straight forward to believe? Politics is not so simple says a political science graduate to me. We share with you as this posting was received from a former political journalists first. Before that Bugi Wijaya told us that headline news is that,”SAPP is also heading for a split” We will keep you informed on the developments as soon as we hear from SAPP.

  • Sept 5 Parti komponen BN Sabah n Sarawak isythiar keluar BN
  • Sept 6.Semua komponen Bn dari semanjung keluar BN kecuali MCA/MIC.
  • Sept 7 10 BN MP umum pindah kerusi ke Pakatan.
  • Sept 8 5 BN menteri letak jawatan
  • Sept 9 Sidang tergempar parlimen di panggil 
  • Sept 10 PM umum letak jawatan
  • Sept 12 Sidang tergempar usul Anwar isythiarkan bentuk sebagai caretaker govt live d TV 1,2 n 3,bernama Tv and Awani Astro
  • Sept 15 Anwar  mengadap Agung n mohon restu.
  • Sept 16 Anwar angkat sumpah sebagai PM  


Besides that we also received this,” “BNBBC has received approval to hold a retreat overseas from Sept 7 to Sept 19. The attendance of all MPs is compulsory.” Anyway, you can just imagine how the technological world works… 

As for this September 16th Long Jump competition we wonder who are the jumpers? It has been called crossover,hoping,defections,migration and now its the LONG JUMP. Tomorrow maybe someone will say that the MPS and political parties have done the TRIPLE JUMP,”Hop,Step and Jump” haha. What a wonderful Malaysia we live in. Everything and anything goes in MALAYSIABOLEHLAND and until we can give you “names,facts,and figures” it will still be a spin and filed under Private and Confidential “916 Political Concept.” Stay tuned and watch this space…………

Related posts :

19 thoughts on “Anwar “Pertandingan LOMPAT JAUH….8.99m” ~Malaysiakini

  1. me_again says:

    Sept 5 Parti komponen BN Sabah n Sarawak isythiar keluar BN

    Today is 5-09-2008 now is 1:54pm Where is the Frog. well another 10 hours will see Sept 6:Semua komponen Bn dari semanjung keluar BN kecuali MCA/MIC.

    I am sitting here to wait for it to happen, another 10 hours to called it s a day for Sept 5 is a long time in politic.

    We shell wait and see what will DSAI say next.

  2. ct says:

    If only life was so simple as that. Anwar snaps his fingers and all his coolies will follow what he says??? ( yaaa, if their brains are in the as……)

  3. DY says:

    me_again, we dun really need PR to form new government on 916. If not 916, we Rakyat r ok with DSAI to be our new PM on 917, 918, 919, 920, 921, 922………………………….anytime after 916. No problem for us. Dun u see the Rakyat’s message clearly? We want a new government.

  4. hostage88 says:

    If this article and what audie posted is true, i do not know what to say of our elected MP’s and politicians from East Malaysia.

    1. Withholding a 3rd party passport and ic is against the law.
    2. Only Employment Agencies do it with foreign workers.

    If to be subjected to that, our elected representative are thus classified in the same breath as the Indonesian Labourers, Maids and I deem them fit for that job only.

    Therefore, if they can not even control their own destiny and be caged up, they are not worthy to represent us.

    Throw them out, we can easily replace this brainless elected politicians with some one with more dignity.

  5. John Daniel says:

    I’ve just called a friend in Sabah and so far have not heard anything yet perhaps this evening we will see a breaking news from TV3 hehehe….

  6. DY says:

    BN is like an old and damaged ship going to sink imminently if not on 916. Do you know that BN is sending all their MPs overseas for study trip now right after 916? What are they scare of if they claim their MPs are very ‘loyal’? And, this is just another act of BN in wasting the public funds…how much is going to cost for sending all the MPs overseas for such a long period!!!

  7. Truth Seeker says:


    read on

    What’s the Meaning of ‘Freedom’? …. But don’t ask a politician!

    by Rep. Ron Paul

    “Man is not free unless government is limited. There’s a clear cause and effect here that is as neat and predictable as a law of physics: As government expands, liberty contracts”.

    – Ronald Reagan

    We’ve all heard the words democracy and freedom used countless times, especially in the context of our invasion of Iraq. They are used interchangeably in modern political discourse, yet their true meanings are very different. George Orwell (picture above right) wrote about “meaningless words” that are endlessly repeated in the political arena. Words like “freedom,” “democracy,” and “justice,” Orwell explained, have been abused so long that their original meanings have been eviscerated. In Orwell’s view, political words are “often used in a consciously dishonest way.” Without precise meanings behind words, politicians and elites can obscure reality and condition people to reflexively associate certain words with positive or negative perceptions. In other words, unpleasant facts can be hidden behind purposely meaningless language.

    As a result, Americans have been conditioned to accept the word “democracy” as a synonym for freedom, and thus to believe that democracy is unquestionably good. The problem is that democracy is not freedom. Democracy is simply majoritarianism, which is inherently incompatible with real freedom. Our founding fathers clearly understood this, as evidenced not only by our republican constitutional system, but also by their writings in the Federalist Papers and elsewhere. James Madison cautioned that under a democratic government, “There is nothing to check the inducement to sacrifice the weaker party or the obnoxious individual.” John Adams argued that democracies merely grant revocable rights to citizens depending on the whims of the masses, while a republic exists to secure and protect preexisting rights.

    Yet how many Americans know that the word “democracy” is found neither in the Constitution nor the Declaration of Independence, our very founding documents? A truly democratic election in Iraq, without U.S. interference and U.S. puppet candidates, almost certainly would result in the creation of a Shi’ite theocracy. Shi’ite majority rule in Iraq might well mean the complete political, economic, and social subjugation of the minority Kurd and Sunni Arab populations. Such an outcome would be democratic, but would it be free? Would the Kurds and Sunnis consider themselves free? The administration talks about democracy in Iraq, but is it prepared to accept a democratically elected Iraqi government no matter what its attitude toward the U.S. occupation? Hardly. For all our talk about freedom and democracy, the truth is we have no idea whether Iraqis will be free in the future.

    They’re certainly not free while a foreign army occupies their country. The real test is not whether Iraq adopts a democratic, pro-Western government, but rather whether ordinary Iraqis can lead their personal, religious, social, and business lives without interference from government. Simply put, freedom is the absence of government coercion. Our Founding Fathers understood this, and created the least coercive government in the history of the world. The Constitution established a very limited, decentralized government to provide national defense and little else. States, not the federal government, were charged with protecting individuals against criminal force and fraud. For the first time, a government was created solely to protect the rights, liberties, and property of its citizens.

    Any government coercion beyond that necessary to secure those rights was forbidden, both through the Bill of Rights and the doctrine of strictly enumerated powers. This reflected the founders’ belief that democratic government could be as tyrannical as any King. Few Americans understand that all government action is inherently coercive. If nothing else, government action requires taxes. If taxes were freely paid, they wouldn’t be called taxes, they’d be called donations. If we intend to use the word freedom in an honest way, we should have the simple integrity to give it real meaning: Freedom is living without government coercion. So when a politician talks about freedom for this group or that, ask yourself whether he is advocating more government action or less. The political left equates freedom with liberation from material wants, always via a large and benevolent government that exists to create equality on earth.

    To modern liberals, men are free only when the laws of economics and scarcity are suspended, the landlord is rebuffed, the doctor presents no bill, and groceries are given away. But philosopher Ayn Rand (and many others before her) demolished this argument by explaining how such “freedom” for some is possible only when government takes freedoms away from others. In other words, government claims on the lives and property of those who are expected to provide housing, medical care, food, etc. for others are coercive?and thus incompatible with freedom. “Liberalism,” which once stood for civil, political, and economic liberties, has become a synonym for omnipotent coercive government. The political right equates freedom with national greatness brought about through military strength.

    Like the left, modern conservatives favor an all-powerful central state? but for militarism, corporatism, and faith-based welfarism. Unlike the Taft-Goldwater conservatives of yesteryear, today’s Republicans are eager to expand government spending, increase the federal police apparatus, and intervene militarily around the world. The last tenuous links between conservatives and support for smaller government have been severed. “Conservatism,” which once meant respect for tradition and distrust of active government, has transformed into big-government utopian grandiosity. Orwell certainly was right about the use of meaningless words in politics. If we hope to remain free, we must cut through the fog and attach concrete meanings to the words politicians use to deceive us.

    We must reassert that America is a republic, not a democracy, and remind ourselves that the Constitution places limits on government that no majority can overrule. We must resist any use of the word “freedom” to describe state action. We must reject the current meaningless designations of “liberals” and “conservatives,” in favor of an accurate term for both: statists. Every politician on earth claims to support freedom. The problem is so few of them understand the simple meaning of the word.


  8. me_again says:

    DY, the Rakyat’s message is clear, We want a new government. yes we want a new goverment be it 916-2008 or 916-2013, i believe the rakyat;s power, not DSAI’s power to go for a change.

    but DSAI have mentioned too many timesssss that he have the number, i can still remember once he said it in Continental hotel in may 2008, that is before he become MP, ” I have the number just the right timing to announce it, may be in june, may be in august and it can be anytime before 916″ well 916 is just another 10 days to go……. “anytime before 916”

    I am sitting here to see it happen.

  9. DY says:

    me_again, good to see that we are on the same new ship not the sinking old boat. If DSAI said he has the number most probably the number is there. If not this can also be seen as a trick to panic Be End and test the loyalty of its MPs. I m enjoying to see DSAI fooling the Be End up side down causing them to make more and more mistakes.

  10. Patek1472 says:

    QUE SERA, SERA -(What Will Be, Will Be)(Apa Yang akan Jadi akan Terjadi)

    Meaning of Que Sera, Sera: Wikipedia
    (Maksud Que Sera, Sera): Wikipedia

    The expression “What will be,will be” is used to describe the notion that fate will decide the outcome of a course of events, even if action is taken to try to alter it.

    (Ungkapan “Apa yang akan jadi akan terjadi digunakan untuk maksud Takdir akan menentukan keputusan kejadian-kejadian seterusnya walaupun tindakan diambil untuk cuba menghalangnya.)

    (Lyrics written by Jay Livingston and Ray Evans
    for Alfred Hitchcock’s 1956 re-make of his 1934 film
    “The Man Who Knew Too Much” starring Doris Day and James Stewart.)

    When I was just a little girl,
    I asked my mother, “What will I be?
    Will I be pretty?
    Will I be rich?”
    Here’s what she said to me:

    “Que sera, sera,
    Whatever will be, will be;
    The future’s not ours to see.
    Que sera, sera,
    What will be, will be.”

    When I was just a child in school,
    I asked my teacher, “What will I try?
    Should I paint pictures”
    Should I sing songs?”
    This was her wise reply:

    “Que sera, sera,
    Whatever will be, will be;
    The future’s not ours to see.
    Que sera, sera,
    What will be, will be.”

    When I grew up and fell in love.
    I asked my sweetheart, “What lies ahead?
    Will we have rainbows
    Day after day?”
    Here’s what my sweetheart said:

    “Que sera, sera,
    Whatever will be, will be;
    The future’s not ours to see.
    Que sera, sera,
    What will be, will be.”

    Now I have Children of my own.
    They ask their mother, “What will I be?”
    Will I be handsome?
    Will I be rich?”
    I tell them tenderly:

    “Que sera, sera,
    Whatever will be, will be;
    The future’s not ours to see.
    Que sera, sera,
    What will be, will be.
    Que Sera, Sera!”

  11. me_again says:


    党正在“赶工”,以确保“916夺权大计”照原订时间进行。该党副主席李文材、总财政梁自坚及选举策略小组主任赛夫丁(Saifuddin Nasution)赛夫丁接受询问时,也说“916夺权大计”还在轨道上,正赶在9月16日当天实现。

    woo ray!!!!!

  12. BUGI WIJAYA says:

    Not bad story but still no movement yet. The sad thing is even those in power believe and are scare of their shadows. If not why they need to pack and shipped their MPs to be exported for a study trip?

  13. young voter says:

    this whole thing about the BOAT sort of reminds me of how great TITANIC was in the ship-building history, even it was claimed the UNSINKABLE ship. but we all know so well how it ended its journey… sunken because of the captain’s ego. there are a lot we can learn from the story of this ship…

  14. bourne ultimatum says:

    In politics anything, everything and all things are dirty. So what if DSAI uses tricks, monkey tactics….as long as he achieves his target…..isn’t that what Machiaveli expressed in his book “The Prince”, the end justifies it’s means…..a taste of the amino bee ann tactics,too. Who has the last laugh if Sept 16 takes place & DSAI succeeds in becoming PM……the MPs today maybe ministers, deputies, pol secs & the ministers/dys maybe mere MPs.

    Bodowi , najis, big mama, musang hassang( who is dying I presume..or really a hide & seek sympathy seeking tactic), guni pak taik, albar etc shall go into hiding…or a typical trend recently, all go missing. Hahahahahahaha

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s